Rio+20 – Is it a good thing that it won’t accomplish anything?

19 Jun

This article(click here) is a brief commentary on Rio+20. I start out agreeing with the author: “It [Rio+20] will accomplish nothing.” Then she goes on to say that it is a good thing that the conference will accomplish nothing, because what the conference is calling for would hurt the world’s poor. She says that “the poor people of the world do not need more organic farming and electric cars. They need more technology and human ingenuity.” Oh, she also mentions that GM foods are more environmentally friendly.

After reading this article, we are left with the question: do the world’s poorest need more and better access to technology, or do they need more sustainable practices? Is it a good thing that Rio+20 will not accomplish anything? Or will the summit surprise us all and actually do something?

2 Responses to “Rio+20 – Is it a good thing that it won’t accomplish anything?”

  1. shiggs91 June 19, 2012 at 9:39 pm #

    I’ve nominated you for the versatile blog award! Congrats and check out my blog to see the rules.

  2. shiggs91 June 19, 2012 at 2:26 pm #

    Well, don’t get me started on GM foods being ‘environmentally friendly’ thats a whole issue itself, but if she believes that then I have to wonder about the validity and research behind her other statements.
    I don’t think that Rio will accomplish much, but I hope it does. If Rio doesn’t accomplish anything we are on a path to further destruction, underdevelopment, overconsumption, and the list goes on and on.. So even if Rio accomplishes nothing, I’ll be wishing it did.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: